Why are High Schools Beefing Up Their Sexual Assault Policies? Pressure from Teens.
Editor’s Note 9/22/2017: Education Secretary Betsy DeVos has reversed Obama-era campus sexual assault policies. Her temporary guidance raises the standard of evidence in cases of campus sexual harassment and violence. This policy change affects young people in college, but also K-12 students.
Oakland Unified School District in California recently revamped their sexual harassment policy. I attended the school board vote with Andrea Zamora, 17, a rising high school senior who helped develop the new policy with local nonprofits, Alliance for Girls and Equal Rights Advocates.
“I feel like all my hard work and everything that we’ve all collaborated together has paid off,” Zamora gushed to me.
The new policy designates a point-person at each school to handle sexual assault and harassment, and lays out the reporting process transparently for students, teachers, and parents alike. Whereas before, Oakland Unified School District had just one person–Gabriel Valenzuela, the district’s ombudsperson–who was responsible for fielding sexual assault and harassment complaints from all 36,668 OUSD students.
Putting such policies in place and training school staff can be expensive, running from $40 thousand to $250 thousand at larger school districts. No targeted funding from the federal government is set aside for Title IX compliance, so schools usually pay for it through their general funds.
As we were sitting in the gym of La Escuelita, watching the school board pass the new policy, Zamora noticed her mom quietly wiping away tears. She, too, got choked up.
Zamora became interested in how schools handle sexual harassment and assault after reflecting on an elementary school ritual,“Slap Ass Friday.”
“The girls were hiding, putting their butts behind the wall. And then guys would try to hit them and get at them,” she said. “The whole time that the girls were trying to cover themselves. The guys were like sharks.”
Actually, I’ve had a run-in with Slap Ass Friday, too. I told Zamora, “I just remember this little twerp sixth grader like running across to me with his hand going up to me and POW!”
I also spoke to a teacher, Rori Abernethy, a former math teacher at Oakland High School, who regularly addressed sexual harassment and assault between students.
“So I got burned out. I felt like I was doing lawyering more than teaching,” Abernethy said. “And that’s a big reason why I left Oakland, because I really want to teach.”
After almost a decade at Oakland High, Abernethy switched districts last year.
“Just the day-to-day job of teaching is exhausting,” she said. “But then you’re stuck between a rock and a hard place. Because if another child comes and reports something, you can’t just let it go. You have to do something. That’s somebody’s life.”
In fact, federal law requires schools to look into sexual harassment and assault, which both fall under Title IX, a law most commonly associated with women’s access to sports.
“Title IX actually covers a surprisingly wide range of activities. It’s an anti-discrimination statute. So for instance sexual harassment, sexual violence is covered by it. Creating a hostile environment could be covered by Title IX,” said William Koski, director of the Youth and Education Law Project at Stanford University.
The threat of a “hostile environment” is a looming concern for sexual assault victims, especially elementary, middle, and high school students. Imagine sitting in second-period history class next to a guy who assaulted you, or running into him alone in an empty hallway. The responsibility of creating a safe learning environment falls onto schools.
Title IX has been around since the 1970’s, but in recent years it has been increasingly applied to sexual violence. Under Title IX, schools may even be accountable for off-campus assaults.
“So for instance, if there is sexual violence at a party or something like that, it’s entirely possible that the victim of that kind of sexual violence will feel quite uncomfortable at school,” Koski further explains.
After reporting a sexual assault, if students and parents are unhappy with the actions of their school, they are able to file a complaint with the federal government. The Office of Civil Rights at the Department of Education has the power to investigate schools for their handling sexual violence. Since 2014 those investigations are up by more than 500 percent.
In one high-profile case at Gwinnett County Public Schools in Georgia, a teen girl says she was sexually assaulted by another student in an empty classroom. In her complaint to the Office of Civil rights, she claims that she was questioned by a school security officer after reporting the alleged assault.
He allegedly asked her, “What were you wearing? Why didn’t you tell your mom ASAP? Are you sure you didn’t want to have oral sex with him? Did you scream?”
The Gwinnett County Public School district repeatedly declined our requests for an interview, but last year, a representative told local TV news reporters that the investigation was conducted “fairly, thoroughly, and promptly,” and that they believed the act was consensual. The district suspended both the accused and the accuser for having sex on campus.
For her part, the girl filed a complaint against the district to the Office of Civil Rights, arguing that her suspension amounts to retaliation for coming forward about her assault. In an email to Youth Radio, the girl has a message for schools:
“My message is simple: It is your job to keep students safe. When a student comes forward and reports an assault, school officials must step up, provide support and take the report seriously.”
This case is still under investigation by the Office of Civil Rights. Gwinnett County Public Schools has three open investigations for how they’ve handled sexual violence–among the highest of any school district in the country.
However, the Trump administration is changing how they handle these complaints. The Department of Education didn’t respond to interview requests, but officials released a statement saying that the changes are meant to streamline investigations, which can take years. Critics argue that the administration is weakening requirements designed to protect school children and guard against systemic abuse, in a moment when sexual violence complaints in schools are on the rise.